California Department of Education, Special Education Division’s special project, California Services for Technical Assistance and Training (CalSTAT) is funded through a contract with the Napa County Office of Education. CalSTAT is partially funded from federal funds, State Grants #H027A080116A. Additional federal funds are provided from a federal competitively awarded State Personnel Development Grant to California (#H323A070011) provided from the U.S. Department of Education Part D of the Individuals with Disabilities Education act (IDEA). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U. S. Department of Education.
Indicator #1 Graduation
Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma compared to percent of all youth in the state graduating with a regular diploma.
Indicator #2 Dropout
Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school compared to the percent of all youth in the state dropping out of high school.
Indicator #3 Statewide Assessment
Participation and performance of children with disabilities on statewide assessments.
Indicator #4 Suspension and Expulsion
Indicator #5 Least Restrictive Environment
Percent of children with IEPs aged 6-21:
Indicator #6 Preschool Least Restrictive Environment
Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received special education and related services in settings with typically developing peers (e.g., early childhood settings, home, and part-time early childhood/part-time early childhood special education settings).
Indicator #7 Preschool Assessment
Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improved:
Indicator #8 Parent Involvement
Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Disproportionality
Indicator #9 Disproportionality Overall
Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator #10 Disproportionality Disability
Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that are the result of inappropriate identification.
Child Find
Indicator #11 Eligibility Evaluation
Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 60 days.
Effective Transition
Indicator #12 Part C to Part B Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an Individualized Education Program (IEP) developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator #13 Secondary Transition Goals and Services
Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the postsecondary goals.
Indicator #14 Post-school
Percent of youth, who had Individualized Education Programs (IEP), are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school.
Indicator #15 General Supervision
General supervision system (including monitoring, complaints, hearings, etc.) identifies and corrects noncompliance as soon as possible but in no case later than one year from identification.
Indicator #16 Complaints
Percent of signed written complaints with reports issued that were resolved within 60-day timeline or a timeline extended for exceptional circumstances with respect to a particular complaint.
Indicator #17 Due Process
Percent of fully adjudicated due process hearing requests that were fully adjudicated within the 45-day timeline or a timeline that is properly extended by the hearing officer at the request of either party.
Indicator #18 Hearing Requests
Percent of hearing request that went to resolution sessions that were resolved through resolution session settlement agreements.
Indicator #19 Mediation
Percent of mediations held that resulted in mediation agreements.
Indicator #20 State-Reported Data
State-reported data (618 and State Performance Plan and Annual Performance Plan Report) are timely and accurate.